Thursday, March 8, 2018

Suing the Internet Censoring - About Time

Concord, NH

District of Merrimack NH Docket # 17-CV-733

Natasha DeLima ET Al

YouTube, Facebook Twitter, Google,, Patreon, and GoFundMe


The Plaintiff has to amend this complaint due to the retaliation, civil rights violations, censorship, and additional harassment abuses on the Plaintiffs.  The Plaintiff has also had to add Plaintiffs and to list additional massive liabilities incurred by the Defendant’s actions.

The Plaintiffs were suffering under the previous listed statutes and violations, but were impacted the recent false narrative and closure, lockout, shutdown and denial of use to their own virtual property.

President Trump had to respond to this recent surge of illicit activity, and the fact that these Defendants are in fact taking illicit hold of our virtual and intellectual property.

President Trump tweeting about intellectual property theft

The U.S. is acting swiftly on Intellectual Property theft. We cannot allow this to happen as it has for many years!

YouTube has been giving false “guidelines” strikes and actual censorship in order to delete the narrative of certain channels, and cannot.  The actions of YouTube are in fact the most illegal abuses to date, thus incurring massive additional liability.
Isaac Green, just 21, has a long career ahead of himself and many working years ahead.  He built up a channel with about 70,000 subscribers (that they showed) and they refused to monetize him.  In late February, they shut down his channel. The liability of YouTube since his working years are between 40-50, have incurred liability from the theft of his virtual property, and the interference with his right to his property and to build it on social media.

The fact that he had to “start over” from virtual theft of his property is magnified by the amount of time he has left to work.  When anyone has a break in their narrative, people drift, think they are gone, “have moved” “left” or stopped doing the work. This interruption has consequences and liabilities for the duration of Plaintiff Isaac’s entire life and his right to his own asset and virtual property.

Plaintiff Natasha has commenced her channel in 2012, and built up an audience, and YouTube hides both the virtual audience, and the millions of views, and has locked her out of her channel.  They have proceeded in 2017, to invent 2 false strikes, that had to be removed, and then in 2018, they commenced again, pulling her videos, her virtual property, and causing her to be locked out of her channel.  They in fact, shut her out for 2 weeks, and they cannot do this. They also deleted 8 additional videos, which does not count the large number they deleted last year. Since Plaintiff Ashley tries to communicate with the Plaintiff, share her content and send her links to news data, her ability to share videos is impacted since when they are deleted, they show up as deleted videos to her audience.

Plaintiff Natasha, with a built up 6 year audience has accrued a level of interest and following that has been severely hampered and derailed as a result of this illicit activity of YouTube.

All Plaintiffs and sources are effected and YouTube and Twitter are 100% liable for every single video, tweet, link, posting that has had to be posted on alternate websites due to censorship.  Each day that passes this liability grows larger, as the Plaintiffs audiences have to search for them in cyberspace.
The monies due for this massive breach of contract, violation of Constitutional rights, theft of their intellectual and virtual property has impact on the world and their viewers.  No one can take over access of your virtual property as stated in the case to date, with other federal rulings on prior acts that these websites have already been cited for.
If we take a single video that each Plaintiff makes, and multiply it over the course of the Plaintiffs working careers, that liability is endless, since the Plaintiff can even leave their virtual property to others in their wills, etc.  This has to be magnified by the amount of work these Plaintiffs due, and the amount of research that their sources like Ashley put into finding information.

The Plaintiff are left virtually “handicapped” from their main audience, and have to “wing it” while trying to find safer websites that operate within the rules of virtual and intellectual property.

In the meantime, YouTube is embezzling at a higher rate the videos that are up, which in Plaintiff Natasha’s website, are close to 6000 videos.  YouTube constantly embezzles from the older videos and when any Plaintiff does not post new content, YouTube CEASES to give monetization and accrued audience numbers on the prior videos, no matter what the number is.

There are MORE people in fact that are now searching for the Plaintiff’s in cyberspace and to the shock of the Plaintiff, people have “found her” on other platforms that are not shown as subscribers of her main YouTube channel, but state that they were, they are just not listed in the viewing audience that YouTube states are subscribed.  

Plaintiffs are selling merchandise to their audiences to support their channels and work, and Plaintiff are effected by loss of purchases, and contributions to their channels while their audiences cannot find them.   YouTube, and Twitter are 100% liable for every dime the Plaintiffs are losing as a result of those people that cannot buy or donate due to not having available new content for which the audience and viewers give in terms of channel support.  All losses and separations from their viewing audiences fall on the Defendants, who have inherited 1005 of that liability.

Twitter has locked the Plaintiff Natasha out of two accounts on Twitter, and now there is a large law suit filed against Twitter.

This recently filed lawsuit in California is a result of Twitter violating free speech, and censorship, which has reached an epic level of abuse in recent days.

The Plaintiffs content is illegally “shadowbanned” which is a virtual manipulation of their postings and content, and disconnecting it from the base of the website so that it looks as though it is there, but in reality, it does not reach a viewing audience.

Twitter hides postings and hashtag content in order to give a different virtual picture than what is really happening, and they cannot do this.

James O’Keefe


The Plaintiffs get compensation under Constitutional law & federal law violations, as well as harm to their audiences and virtual property.

It is under that liability that the Plaintiffs seek additional compensation to the original complaint for all massive theft of their virtual and intellectual property, the DAMAGE TO THEIR base following, the additional new subscribers and potential growth of their virtual property.  The original complaint only dealt with embezzlement of earnings, not complete theft of their virtual property

The Plaintiffs seek an additional $1 Billion dollars in damages and sanctions for YouTube and Twitter for the illicit shutdown of their virtual and intellectual property and additional sanctions for each day where they do not have access to this property.  Each site that continues to block, lockout, shadowban, give false community strikes, threats to shut down their channels, the YouTube shutdown of AntiSchool, and the 2 week suspension into the Plaintiff’s channel, at the cost of $300,000 per day per site.

Signed, The Plaintiffs, Natasha DeLima et al

Monday, March 5, 2018

Media Censoring of Conservative Websites, Must End

Tech Giants Google and Facebook are currently purging conservative content from Facebook and YouTube — They are hiding conservative stories on Google — They are shadow-banning conservative news on all social media.

In February Facebook launched a new algorithm to ensure that conservative news would not spread on the social media platform. The algorithm change caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping 45%.
In contrast, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) do not appear to have suffered a comparable decline in Facebook engagement.
Top conservative Facebook pages with daily traffic in the millions have seen 75% to 95% drop in traffic.
Young Cons, Western Journalism, SarahPalin.comIndependent Journal Review, Right Wing News, and several others have seen dramatic loss in traffic.
The Gateway Pundit does not rely on Facebook for our traffic numbers. Still, we saw a significant drop in Facebook traffic last month.
This is criminal behavior.  They take your money for advertising then shadow-ban your site.
This is the definition of a scam.

Meanwhile, liberal sites are doing fine this year.

Google also deleted several top Conservative channels this week.

Conservative YouTube channels were deleted in a Google purge this week.
Google later said they “accidentally” deleted conservative channels.
During the election conservatives fled the corrupt mainstream media and went online to get their news from trusted websites.

Today far left tech giants want conservative sites eliminated.

The left is even targeting the advertising and income of conservative websites.

It’s time to regulate Google and Facebook!

* * * * * * * * * *

Here is an initial list of top conservative websites that have been blacklisted and targeted by Google, YouTube and Facebook.

Young Cons: Extremely popular conservative news site and received millions of daily readers during the election.  The website received nearly all of its traffic from Facebook. Since 2016 Facebook shut down stories to Young Cons.  Each algorithm change meant less traffic for the popular website.  YoungCons was blacklisted by Facebook and struggles to maintain readers.  The site regularly switches domains to save traffic. With over 4 million fans one of the popular conservative pages on Facebook until Facebook blocked all traffic to the website.  The page was forced to change the domain to save traffic numbers.
Right Wing News:  Right Wing News grew to an enormous website in the past few years thanks its popularity on Facebook. In July of 2015, in just a week, the Right Wing News Facebook page reached 133 million people. Because conservatives were sharing content they were interested in, Right Wing News (with 3.6 million Facebook likes ) was driving the same amount of web traffic as some of the biggest newspapers in America.  Since the 2016 election Facebook blocked traffic to the website.  Owner John Hawkins announced he was shutting down the website in January.
Western Journalism: Newsweek reported that the site has grown from receiving 1,000 page views a day in 2009[3] to more than 1 million during 2016. The website was averaging around 6 million page views a day according to Quantcast during the election. Today it is down to around 500,000 a day. Western Journalism was blacklisted by Facebook.
The Gateway Pundit: TGP was ranked as the 4th most influential conservative news source during the 2016 election. The site in 2016 received nearly a third of its traffic from Facebook. This past weekend Facebook blocked all traffic from recent stories to the website. TGP advertised with Facebook and is another top conservative website blacklisted by the company. TGP is also shadow-banned by Google and frequently attacked and smeared by the liberal media.
President Trump Facebook page:  A recent algorithm change has caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping 45%. In contrast, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT) do not appear to have suffered a comparable decline in Facebook engagement, reported Breitbart’s Alum Bokhari.
Independent Journal Review:  A massive conservative website based on Facebook audience.  The Independent Journal Review (IJR) terminated a number of its employees on Thursday, leaving an unclear future for the millennial-focused conservative website that has recently faced a declining audience.  IDF was also shadow-banned and blacklisted.  Breitbart was the most influential conservative news source in 2016 with a massive audience.  Since the election Breitbart is constantly targeted and smeared by far left operations.  Breitbart advertising was targeted by Sleeping Giants and other Soros sites.
InfoWars:  Infowars is another dominant conservative site with enormous traffic.  After several years of video production and tens of thousands of video YouTube gave Infowars its third strike this week and threatens to shut the YouTube Channel down.
Rightside Broadcasting: This YouTube Channel had millions of views before the election.  Since 2016 YouTube has shadow-banned all of their videos.  YouTube has classified its videos of President Trump at a rally as hate speech.  YouTube has demonetized hundreds of its videos.  YouTube hides its videos.  Income for the site is down 95% since the election.
Natural News: A very prominent health website and the world’s top source on natural health. The site receives tens of thousands of readers every day. YouTube wiped out over 1,700 videos covering everything from nutrition, natural medicine, history, science and current events.

Sunday, March 4, 2018

YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook Censoring Must End

These comments are regarding the censoring of conservative and Christian websites on 32/2018. 

The main fix for censoring is for Infowars host their own webserver and copy contents over to mirrored servers around the world.  Most direct-to-internet providers can host this service. This way you have total control, but a little more difficult to manage.  Infowars would then be required to advertise back at YouTube (if allowed), and can offer advertisers onto their site and keep the extra money.  this way, Infowars can become the YouTube replacement for themselves and other conservative websites.

Saturday, March 3, 2018

Trade Tariffs - a Good Thing Right Now

New tariffs:
25% increase on steel
10% increase on aluminum

232: In early 2017, the Administration initiated Section 232 investigations into whether imports of steel and aluminum threaten to impair the National Security.  Those investigations found that the quantity of steel and aluminum imports and the circumstance of global excess capacity threaten to impair the national security.  The President is now considering proposals, including quotas and tariffs, in order to adjust imports to a level that does not threaten to impair the national security.

Other countries promised to retaliate against quintessential American goods like Kentucky bourbon, bluejeans and Harley-Davidson motorcycles.  

"Big FN deal", 
  1. Everyone keeps buying booze, just like cigarettes regardless of cost.
  2. Do we still make bluejeans?  Levis moved out.  
  3. Harley Davidson Motorcycles: they don't buy them anyway.
PS: Tariffs can be changed at anytime to adjust for circumstances

The US is currently the world’s largest steel importer.
But this was not the first time President Trump talked about taxing foreign products.

In 2011 Donald Trump went on a profanity-laced speech in Las Vegas where he promised to tax China imports by 25% if they continued to manipulate their currency.


Thursday, March 1, 2018

AR Rifles are Modern Sporting Rifles

We must change the nomenclature of the leftists:
ARs are modern sporting rifles (MSR)
ARs are NOT Machine Guns or fully automatic weapons
ARs are NOT military weapons, the military does not use them.
ARs are like Ford's Model-T autos, the first product that has modular attributes

Trump Wants Government to Take Action without Court Review, NOT what he said.

Trump was speaking specifically of taking guns from mental patients as soon as a field judgement is made, with followup in court. This process of immediately stopping continued dangerous actions is actually done quite often now. One example is if the police pull you over while driving and find you drunk, you car is taken away and stored while you go to jail, then court. Your vehicle is returned to you under court decided conditions. Emergency conditions can TEMPORARILY suspend rights to save one's life. As long as these emergency conditions are met and you get your guns back to you if the court decides it was done in error, then it's not that big of a problem. The problem with Trump's statement is that the democrats believes it means it's okay to take ALL guns now without a law or judicial review and never return them. If this happens, then it is civil war time.

Mass Shootings, Why the USA has one of the Lowest Quantity.

Thanks to Human Events for this article subset
Thanks to our Second Amendment, the United States has fewer mass shootings per capita than many other developed countries, including Norway, France, Switzerland, Finland, Belgium and the Czech Republic. (And 98 percent of our mass shootings occur in “gun-free zones.”)
But imagine if we could cut our mass shootings in half?
There have been about 34 mass shootings since 2000. Forty-seven percent — 16 — were committed by first- and second-generation immigrants, i.e. people who never would have been here but for Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act.
And the immigrant mass shootings have been some of the most spectacular ones, such as Fort Hood and San Bernardino. Two of the deadliest mass shootings in U.S. history, at Virginia Tech in 2007 and at the Pulse Nightclub in 2016, were committed by first- and second-generation immigrants, i.e., people who were in this country because Teddy was pouting in his room and refused to come out until he got his own legacy.
(Excluded from both lists: the Las Vegas shooting, because law enforcement has released nothing but lies about it, so that shooting remains unclassifiable; family dispute shootings; targeted assassinations of police officers; and shootings on Indian reservations.)
Here’s the list of immigrant mass shootings, defined as a shooting at the same general time and location, not during the commission of another crime, that leaves at least four people dead — i.e. no gangland shootings, no “man kills family, then self” and no drug deals gone bad.
On account of the Rule of Journalism that permits the word “immigrant” to be used only in sentences with the word “valedictorian,” you may not have heard of some of these mass shootings at all.
1) Omar Mateen, son of Afghan immigrants, killed 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando on June 12, 2016.
2) First- and second-generation Pakistani immigrants Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik opened fire at a community center Christmas party in San Bernardino, California, on Dec. 2, 2015, killing 14 people.
3) English immigrant Christopher Harper-Mercer killed 9 people at Umpqua Community College in southwest Oregon on Oct. 1, 2015.
4) Kuwaiti immigrant Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez shot and killed five people in attacks on two military installations in Chattanooga, Tennessee, on July 16, 2015.
5) Second-generation Malaysian immigrant Elliot Rodger killed six people on May 23, 2014, around the campus of the University of California, Santa Barbara.
6) Second-generation immigrant John Zawahri opened fire at his Southern California home and later at the campus of Santa Monica College on June 7, 2013, killing five in all. (The New York Times never mentioned that he was the child of Lebanese immigrants. The Times didn’t even mention that his Arab father used to beat up his mother, despite that paper’s usual heightened interest in stories about men being mean to women.)
7) Cuban immigrant Pedro Alberto Vargas fatally shot six people in his apartment complex in Hialeah, Florida, on July 26, 2013.
8) Probable Barbadian immigrant Aaron Alexis shot and killed 12 people inside the Washington Navy Yard on Sept. 16, 2013. (See
9) South Korean immigrant One L. Goh opened fire at Oikos University in Oakland, California, killing seven people on April 2, 2012.
10) Mexican immigrant Eduardo Sencion shot up an IHOP in Carson City, Nevada, on Sept. 6, 2011, killing four people — three National Guardsmen and a 67-year-old woman.
11) Second-generation immigrant Nidal Malik Hasan, son of Palestinian immigrants, killed 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, on Nov. 5, 2009.
12) Vietnamese immigrant Jiverly Wong shot up the Binghamton, New York, American Civic Association on April 3, 2009, killing 13.
13) Bosnian immigrant Sulejman Talovic fatally shot five people at the Trolley Square Mall in Salt Lake City on Feb. 12, 2007.
14) Seung-Hui Cho, a South Korean immigrant, slaughtered 32 people at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007.
15) Hmong immigrant Chai Soua Vang killed six hunters in northern Wisconsin on Nov. 21, 2004.
16) Mexican immigrant Salvador Tapia shot up the Windy City Core Supply warehouse in Chicago in 2003, killing six of his former co-workers.
If you missed your favorite immigrant mass shooting, please note that I excluded Jamaican immigrant Colin Ferguson (Long Island Railroad massacre in 1993); Nigerian immigrant Peter Odighizuwa (Appalachian School of Law shooting in 2002); Haitian illegal immigrant Kesler Dufrene (North Miami shooting in 2012); and Nigerian immigrant Henry Williams Obotetukudo (Bronx-Lebanon Hospital shooting in 2017). We are only counting mass shootings since 2000 that left at least four people dead.
First- and second-generation immigrants have committed more than 40 percent of all mass shootings since 2000. I know we’ve been admitting Third World immigrants at a breakneck pace, but I don’t think immigrants make up nearly half the population yet.
Once we exclude the immigrant mass shooters, a clearer pattern emerges. The typical American perpetrator is a young man with paranoid schizophrenia — or, as we’re now euphemistically calling it, “autism” — probably exacerbated by pot, a deadly combo platter.
An immigration moratorium and widespread deportations would not only cut mass shootings in half, but it would also free up the FBI’s time to focus on these delusional young men with the terrifying stare, who hear voices no one else hears.
Young men like Nikolas Cruz.